Thinker Blog 考える人のブログ
  • BLOG
  • AUTHOR
  • PURPOSE
  • ARCHIVES
  • CONTACT
  • BLOG
  • AUTHOR
  • PURPOSE
  • ARCHIVES
  • CONTACT

THINKER BLOG

116: Truth on Gender Equality (5)

2/25/2025

 
【What Elections Tell Us】
In the US presidential election last November, a rapist and convicted felon Donald Trump, who was found liable in a sexual assault lawsuit, was elected.
 
Trump and his enablers loudly propagate, “Sexual crimes must not be tolerated. Therefore, we must shut out and deport immigrants/refugees.” However, if they’re serious about “Sexual crimes must not be tolerated,” then the easiest first step is to "Not vote for a rapist."
 
What’s more, Trump and his enablers repeatedly make discriminatory remarks and incite violence against people living outside of the majority identity, including women and LGBTQ individuals. We can see through these actions that “Sexual crimes must not be tolerated” is nothing more than an empty slogan for Trump and his enablers, lacking sincerity, and only using those words for personal gain.
 
Sadly, this election revealed the fact that many conservative people in America still refuse to elect a female president, spew toxic masculinity reflecting mental immaturity, and disturbingly insist on "Your (female) body, my (male) choice!" It’s a genuine disappointment that the liberal efforts to advance gender equality and human rights fell short.
 
That said, it's not all without hope.
 
In fact, the national popular vote tells us a more nuanced story.
 
  • 2024: Trump 49.8% vs Harris 48.3% → 1.5%pt conservative win
  • 2020: Biden 51.3% vs Trump 46.8% → 4.5%pt liberal win
  • 2016: Hillary 48.2% vs. Trump 46.1% → 2.1%pt liberal win, but the twisted system [See #66] awarded presidency to a conservative
 
Considering these facts, we can observe that the pendulum of gender equality in America is swinging back and forth between the liberals (Democratic) and conservatives (Republican), in order to bring it to parity as if to approach an equilibrium.
 
On the other hand, in Japan last October. The UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women recommended that Japan amend its Civil Law which requires the married couples use the same surname, and introduce an optional separate surname system. This was the fourth such recommendation, with the committee pointing out that “regarding existing discriminatory provisions . . . no steps had been taken.”
 
The committee also recommended revising the Imperial Household Law which limits succession to male heirs down the male line, and the repeal of regulations requiring spousal consent for women seeking abortion. Furthermore, the committee called for sincere efforts to guarantee the rights of the wartime “Comfort Women” victims [See #21].
 
Against these recommendations, the Japanese government, led by the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), responded last month by deciding to exclude this committee from Japan’s contributions to the UN. Rather than acknowledging the mistakes of discrimination and advancing toward gender equality, the LDP administration instead retaliated in a way that seemingly mimics Trump’s petty tactics.
 
Founded in 1955, the LDP has ruled most of post-war Japan with an exception of 5 years in aggregate. While many agree that the general election last October dealt a huge loss for the LDP, it still remains the largest and continues to hold power.
 
And the vote shares further tell us a disappointing fact.
 
  • Conservatives (LDP, Komeito, Ishin, Kokumin, Sanseito, CPJ): Total 62.5%
  • Liberals (Constitutional Dems, JCP, Reiwa, Social Dems): Total 37.5%
 
The fact of the matter is, the conservatives won by a whopping margin of 25%pts!
 
Given this, unlike in the US, there are no signs of a pendulum swinging toward gender equality in Japan, rigidly stuck on the conservative side.
 
This creates a certain sense of hopelessness in Japan.
 
In any national election, who we vote for reveals the state of the nation. It reflects people's thoughts, attitudes, and values.
 
Of course, it’s true that “Gender equality is not the only issue of consideration for my vote.” Yet, the fact that this issue has been left behind for nearly 70 years allows us to see through people's true feelings.


Read Next: Truth on Gender Equality (6)【Action Creates Progress】
Read Previous: Truth on Gender Equality (4)【Respect Individuality】

Complete Series: Truth on Gender Equality (1)~(6)
[1]   [2]   [3]   [4]   [5]   [6]  
 
Read Theme: Perspective

Comments are closed.
    ENG/JPN Posted Alternately
    日本語/英語を交互に掲載

    Author プロフィール

    JOE KIM
    Retired from business at age 34. Now, an active supporter of inclusive initiatives globally.
    Actions to date here.


    34歳でビジネスから引退。現在は、インクルーシブな支援活動家。
    ​これまでの主な活動はこちら。

    Theme ​テーマ

    All
    ALL ENGLISH BLOG
    ALL日本語ブログ
    Discrimination
    Environment
    Family
    Inclusive Diversity
    Inheritance
    Morality
    On-site Report
    Perspective
    Violence/Peace
    ある視点
    倫理観
    多様性/インクルーシブ
    家族
    差別
    暴力/平和
    現場ルポ
    環境
    相続

    Archives 記事一覧

    Visits ​アクセス

    15,384 (as of 4/1/2026)

    RSS Feed

    画像
    Picture
    写真
    写真
    Picture
    写真
    画像
    画像
    画像
    画像
    画像
    画像
    写真
    画像
    画像
    写真
    写真
    画像
    写真
© COPYRIGHT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.